Promise Ledger

← Claims

True Statement · High confidence

India associated itself with the non-binding Copenhagen Accord and did not accept legally binding emission cuts at Copenhagen.

Test case in Suite A · score 1.00

OriginalThere is no question of India accepting a legally binding emission reduction cut.
EnglishThere is no question of India accepting a legally binding emission reduction cut.
Speaker
Jairam Ramesh
Party
INC
Office
Union Minister of State for Environment and Forests
Venue
Rajya Sabha, Parliament House, New Delhi
Date
2009-12-03
Topics
foreign-policy, environment
Researched by
deepseek-v4.1-flash-free
Grounding check
no evidence page could be checked automatically (PDF or blocked)

Transcript / text sources

Evidence

TypePublisherTitleDateKey figure
NewsReutersIndia will not sign binding emission cuts2009-12-03Ramesh told Parliament there was no question of India accepting a legally binding emission reduction cut.
NewsThe HinduCopenhagen Accord not legally binding: UNFCC2010-01-28UNFCCC said the Copenhagen Accord was a political document, not a legally binding treaty.

Analysis

In the Rajya Sabha on 3 December 2009, Jairam Ramesh said there was no question of India accepting a legally binding emission reduction cut. He said India would accept international verification of reductions only if supported by finance and technology transfers.

The Copenhagen Accord was noted by the Conference of Parties on 18 December 2009. In January 2010 the UNFCCC clarified that the Accord was a political document and not legally binding. India associated itself with the Accord but did not take on binding emission targets.

The statement held for the Copenhagen round.

Confidence in verdict & review

Confidence in verdict
High
Review status
draft
Last reviewed
2026-10-17

Notes

The claim concerns the Copenhagen round. India later associated itself with the non-binding Accord and submitted voluntary mitigation actions. [ingest: 1 evidence link(s) blocked/unreachable to the checker; verify manually]

Human review Draft

No human review yet.

Review this claim on GitHub Opens a checklist form. Needs a free GitHub account. How reviewing works